investors

BROKER REPORT: Timothy L. Pilkington Is Barred from the Securities Industry

October 9, 2015 | Malecki Law Team

The securities fraud attorneys at Malecki Law are interested in hearing from investors who have complaints against stockbroker Timothy L. Pilkington. Mr. Pilkington was employed and registered with Stephens, a broker-dealer with an office in Memphis Tennessee from January 2012 through March 2015, according to his publicly available BrokerCheck, as maintained by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). He was also previously registered with Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, according to industry records.

According to his BrokerCheck, Mr. Pilkington was the subject of one customer complaint in 2009. More recently, a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) was accepted by FINRA stating that Mr. Pilkington was barred from associating with any broker-dealer for failing to respond to the FINRA 8210 request for information. 8210 Requests require that people registered to recommend and sell securities must provide documents, testimony and information regarding matters under investigation. According to the AWC, Mr. Pilkington failed to disclose two FDIC orders to FINRA. One of those orders disclosed that Mr. Pilkington agreed to pay $2,500, where “the FDIC considered the matter and determined it had reason to believe that the [he] has engaged or participated in violations of law, unsafe or unsound banking practices and/or breaches of fiduciary duty.” In another FDIC order, Mr. Pilkington was “prohibited from participating in the conduct of affairs of, or exercising voting rights in, any insured institution without the prior written approval of the FDIC.”

If you or a family member lost money that was invested with Mr. Pilkington, you are encouraged to contact the securities fraud lawyers at Malecki Law for a free consultation and case evaluation at (212) 943-1233.

Senior-Aged Investors and other Conservative Investors Likely at Risk in Current Low-Yield Environment

August 26, 2015 | Malecki Law Team

The recent market correction has caused many people to worry about the performance of their securities accounts. Senior-aged investors (and other conservative investors) are particularly at risk for losses in their accounts if they were inappropriately invested too heavily in equities and other alternative investments.

The Op-Ed published in the Wall Street Journal on August 24, 2015 notes that the low-yield bond environment has enticed some investors to “climb on the bandwagon of rising share prices.” Brokers may be similarly tempted to recommend risky stocks to their conservative investors, and to recommend concentrated levels of stocks. However, what may be suitable for a middle-aged investor may not be suitable for an senior-aged investor.

Suitability is an important investor-specific inquiry both the broker and broker-dealer must perform to ensure the investments that are recommended are appropriate given the age, relative wealth, experience and risk tolerance of each investor, among other factors. A broker’s unsuitable recommendations could be especially problematic for those investors seeking stability and safety of principal, including senior-aged investors who rely on their securities portfolios to generate income.

Citigroup Affiliates Charged With Defrauding Investors Settle with SEC For $180 Million

August 18, 2015 | Jenice L. Malecki, Esq.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced this week that two Citigroup Affiliates, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (CGMI) and Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC (CAI), agreed to pay $180 million to settle charges of defrauding investors with false and misleading claims. According to allegations, these Citigroup affiliates had claimed that their hedge funds, Falcon fund and ASTA/MAT, were low-risk products safe for traditional bond investors, however, these funds collapsed during the financial crisis.

According to SEC’s investigations, the above mentioned Citigroup affiliates raised almost $3 billion from 4,000 investors by making false and misleading representations for their hedge funds. They are reported as having continued to claim that these funds were low-risk and made false assurances about liquidity even as the funds started collapsing. The investigation also revealed that CAI raised $110 million in additional investments even when the fund was in dire situation and Citigroup employees presented the funds to investors in a manner that was at odds with the fine print in the written and marketing materials provided to investors. The Citigroup affiliates consented to settle without admitting or denying the findings that they willfully violated Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933, GCMI willfully violated Section 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and CAI willfully violated Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rules 206(4)-7 and 206(4)-8. The firms have also consented to censure and will cease and desist from future violations.

Malecki Law takes a proactive and informed approach to national and international financial news of today. This represents a classic case of Securities Fraud where investors are misled into investing in unsuitable products. SEC holds investment firms and brokers accountable for looking out for investors’ best interests and the team at Malecki Law represents and guides investors who have been victimized by false claims, false assurances and misrepresentations. For a comprehensive list of kinds of Securities Fraud please click here and contact us if you feel you have suffered similar losses.