broker fraud

New Study Reveals: 7% of Financial Advisers Are Guilty of Misconduct. How Safe Are You?

March 21, 2016 | Malecki Law Team

In February 2016, academics Mark Egan, Gregor Matvos and Amit Seru at the University of Minnesota and University of Chicago business schools released a report titled “The Market for Financial Adviser Misconduct” on financial advisers in the United States. The report reveals how rampant securities fraud and broker misconduct is throughout the country. For the purpose of the study, these academics have analyzed the full set of disclosures of approximately 10% of employees in the finance and insurance sectors between 2005 and 2015, and taken in to account customer complaints, arbitrations, regulatory actions, terminations, bankruptcy filings and criminal proceedings. Based on this study, 7% of advisers were reported to have engaged in misconduct. The actual unreported cases may add to this number.

Here at Malecki Law, it is our mission to protect individuals who have been victimized by unscrupulous brokers. Here are some excerpts highlighting the important findings from this study:

According to the report, prior offenders are five times more likely to repeat their misconduct as compared to an average adviser. Approximately one-third of advisers with misconduct reports are repeat offenders. That is why we encourage all investors to investigate their broker on FINRA’s BrokerCheck

Customer Complaints Against Brian J. Gold of UBS in Florida

January 14, 2016 | Malecki Law Team

The investment and securities fraud attorneys at Malecki Law are interested in hearing from investors who have complaints regarding Florida-based UBS stockbroker Brian J. Gold.

According to his BrokerCheck report maintained by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), Mr. Gold has been the subject of no less than five customer complaints and was discharged from Morgan Stanley DW in 2004.

In addition to UBS and Morgan Stanley, FINRA reports that Mr. Gold has also been registered with Merrill Lynch in Florida, Advest in Connecticut, and Prudential in New York City.

PIABA Study Reveals that FINRA’s Effort to Curb Broker Record-cleansing Has Not Been Met With Success

October 26, 2015 | Malecki Law Team

According to Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association’s (PIABA) latest report, FINRA’s efforts to curb broker expungement and clear records of misconduct have failed to reduce the number of times it occurs. According to PIABA, between, 2012-14 expungement was granted in 87.8% of cases in which it was sought.

When brokers are granted expungement for alleged wrongdoings, this record is wiped out from FINRA’s BrokerCheck and FINRA is concerned that it might cause an impression about the broker’s ethic that is misleading.

Since 2014, FINRA has increased arbitrator guidance and training and introduced rules that prohibit arbitration settlements with expungement as a condition. FINRA has sought to grant expungement as an “extraordinary remedy” only to be available in cases where the broker’s record has no value for investor protection. FINRA’s arbitration task force is considering creating a Special Arbitration Panel comprised of specially trained arbitrators to make decisions on expungement requests.

BROKER REPORT: Ameriprise’s Thomas E. Stratton-Crooke of Ohio Suspended By FINRA

September 25, 2015 | Malecki Law Team

The investment fraud attorneys at Malecki Law are interested in hearing from investors who have complaints financial advisor Thomas E. Stratton-Crooke of Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc., based out of Beachwood, OH.

Records from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) indicate that Mr. Stratton-Crooke has been suspended by FINRA for 10 business days and fined $10,000 for improperly executing discretionary transactions in customer accounts without prior written authorization from the customer or authorization from his firm.

According to his BrokerCheck Report, Mr. Stratton-Crooke was discharged by Merrill Lynch in 2014, after 25 years with the firm, for what is believed to be the same misconduct that led to his suspension by FINRA.

BROKER REPORT: Cambria’s Robert H. Potter, Discharged and Barred

September 24, 2015 | Malecki Law Team

The investment fraud attorneys at Malecki Law are interested in hearing from investors who have complaints regarding former stockbroker Robert H. Potter. According to his BrokerCheck report maintained by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), Mr. Potter has been permanently barred by FINRA. He has also reportedly been the subject of no less than three customer complaints.

Mr. Potter has reportedly been barred by FINRA for his failure to cooperate with an investigation into allegations that Mr. Potter comingled customer funds with his own personal funds. Per FINRA, Mr. Potter was discharged from Cambria Capital in August 2015, after the firm questioned the validity of certain transactions involving Mr. Potter and his customers.

In 1997, Mr. Potter was the subject of a customer complaint alleging unauthorized, excessive trading, per FINRA. FINRA records indicate that the customer recovered more than $66,000 as a result of their complaint.

BROKER REPORT: Former California-based Raymond James Broker James Belenis Suspended by FINRA

September 23, 2015 | Malecki Law Team

The investment fraud attorneys at Malecki Law are interested in hearing from investors who have complaints against stockbroker James D. Belenis of KMS Financial Services, Inc., based out of Davis, CA. and previously of Raymond James Financial.

Mr. Belenis has been suspended by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) for a period of 20 days and fined $5,000 for his activities in connection with the improper raising of capital for a gold mining operation, according to FINRA.

Before joining KMS, Mr. Belenis was discharged from Raymond James for engaging in unauthorized private securities transactions away from the firm, per FINRA. These are believed to be the same activities for which he was suspended.

FINRA Crackdown on Broker Migration: 10 Former Global Arena Representatives Sanctioned After On-site exam

September 18, 2015 | Malecki Law Team

FINRA reported that it barred 10 former Global Arena Representatives including the former President of Global Arena Capital Corp., Barbara Desiderio, and five former representatives (David Awad a.k.a. David Bennett, James Torres, Peter Snetzko, Alex Wildermuth, and Michael Tannen) in all capacities; barred two former principals, Kevin Hagan and Richard Bohack, for supervisory failures; sanctioned two other former brokers, Niaz Elmazi a.k.a. Nick Morrisey and Andrew Marze, for failing to cooperate with FINRA’s investigation. FINRA had cancelled Global Arena’s membership and barred the owner and three other brokers for fraud in July 2015 in a separate action.

FINRA announced that a 2014 on-site audit and investigation at Global Arena Capital Corp had allegedly revealed several instances of securities fraud including product misrepresentation, use of misleading claims, account churning, unsuitability, and other misconduct like use of high pressure sales tactics to make sales of junk bonds to customers. FINRA reports that their business model involved cold calling vulnerable groups of investors including seniors to make solicited recommendations of securities. These sanctions reiterate FINRA’S focus on tracking down groups of brokers who migrate from one risky and problem-ridden firm to another, with questionable practices. In this instance reported by FINRA, seven of the ten individuals had moved to Global Arena’s new office from HFP Capital Market, a firm that was expelled by FINRA in 2013. Apparently, FINRA’s risk-based approach identified certain brokers who had moved from HFP for heightened regulatory investigation, which confirmed FINRA’s suspicions. In settling the actions, the respondents neither admitted nor denied the charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA’s findings.

According to Susan Axelrod, FINRA’s Executive Vice President, Regulatory Operations, FINRA will continue will continue to monitor brokers who move from expelled or high-risk securities firms. They will use data leveraged from their study of broker migration to expedite investigations and sanction brokers who tend to prey on vulnerable investors.

BROKER REPORT: John Smallwood of Commonwealth Financial

September 5, 2015 | Malecki Law Team

The securities fraud attorneys are interested in hearing from investors with complaints involving John Smallwood of Commonwealth Financial Network. Per his BrokerCheck Report, maintained by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), Mr. Smallwood is a registered stock broker with Commonwealth, based out of Red Bank, NJ.

Mr. Smallwood’s BrokerCheck Report indicates that he has been the subject of at least two customer complaints in the past three-plus years. Per FINRA, the complaints against Mr. Smallwood have alleged unsuitable investment recommendations and breach of fiduciary duty, among other things.

FINRA records indicate that Mr. Smallwood’s customers have recovered $90,000 and $97,500 respectively in connection with their complaints.

Seven Complaints Against Broker and Financial Advisor Jeffrey A. Fladell

August 28, 2015 | Jenice L. Malecki, Esq.

The securities fraud team at Malecki Law is interested in investigating possible claims on behalf of investors who have complaints regarding broker and investment advisor Jeffrey A. Fladell. Registered with RBC Capital Markets, Fladell has been the subject of multiple investigations, customer disputes and settlements since 1987, according to Financial Industry’s Regulatory Authority (FINRA’s) BrokerCheck.

In 2014, there was a customer complaint reported against Fladell for alleged unsuitable investments and overconcentration in municipal bonds which was adverse to their investment objectives, and the claimant was granted $75,000 in damages. In another customer complaint involving similar securities misconduct allegations, the customer dispute was settled for $1,000,000 in 2013. Previous complaints registered with FINRA against Fladell involve allegations of unsuitability, overconcentration and misrepresentation dating back to 1987.

In 1992, National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) subjected him to a statutory disqualification as a result of his guilty plea to one misdemeanor count of submitting a false document to the IRS in connection with his income tax return. Fladell was previously registered with J.B. Hanauer & Co, Halpert and Company, Travelers Equities Sales, Swanton Securities, Hermes Securities and Bernard Schnitzer.

Senior-Aged Investors and other Conservative Investors Likely at Risk in Current Low-Yield Environment

August 26, 2015 | Malecki Law Team

The recent market correction has caused many people to worry about the performance of their securities accounts. Senior-aged investors (and other conservative investors) are particularly at risk for losses in their accounts if they were inappropriately invested too heavily in equities and other alternative investments.

The Op-Ed published in the Wall Street Journal on August 24, 2015 notes that the low-yield bond environment has enticed some investors to “climb on the bandwagon of rising share prices.” Brokers may be similarly tempted to recommend risky stocks to their conservative investors, and to recommend concentrated levels of stocks. However, what may be suitable for a middle-aged investor may not be suitable for an senior-aged investor.

Suitability is an important investor-specific inquiry both the broker and broker-dealer must perform to ensure the investments that are recommended are appropriate given the age, relative wealth, experience and risk tolerance of each investor, among other factors. A broker’s unsuitable recommendations could be especially problematic for those investors seeking stability and safety of principal, including senior-aged investors who rely on their securities portfolios to generate income.